There’s something deeply unsettling about hearing one of venture capital’s most respected figures declare that his entire industry is fundamentally broken. Roelof Botha, the managing partner at Sequoia Capital, recently dropped what amounts to a truth bomb on the VC world: “Investing in venture is a return-free risk.” This isn’t just another market correction observation; it’s a systemic indictment from someone who’s been at the heart of Silicon Valley’s money machine for over two decades. When the person who helped build PayPal and now stewards one of the world’s most successful VC firms tells you the math doesn’t work, it’s time to pay attention.
Botha’s critique centers on a simple but devastating mathematical reality. The venture industry pours between $150-200 billion into companies annually, yet to generate reasonable returns, it would need to produce over $1 trillion in exits every single year. Let that sink in for a moment. To make the numbers work, we’d need 40 companies the size of Figma’s recent $26 billion valuation going public or being acquired annually. The historical data tells a different story: only about 20 companies per decade achieve billion-dollar-plus exits. The gap between capital deployed and realistic outcomes isn’t just wide—it’s a chasm that suggests the entire venture model has become detached from economic reality.
What’s particularly fascinating about Botha’s analysis is his assertion that “I don’t think venture is an asset class.” This isn’t just provocative rhetoric—it’s a fundamental challenge to how we think about venture investing. When capital becomes so abundant that it chases too few quality opportunities, the basic principles of risk-adjusted returns collapse. More money doesn’t magically create more brilliant founders or groundbreaking ideas. Instead, it inflates valuations, distorts incentives, and creates what Botha calls “return-free risk”—the worst of all possible outcomes where you take on significant risk with little expectation of reward.
The irony here is palpable. Venture capital, which prides itself on funding innovation and disruption, has become trapped in its own outdated structures. Botha points to Sequoia’s recent move away from the traditional 10-year fund cycle as evidence that even the most successful firms recognize the need for fundamental change. The old model, built for a different era of company building and exit timelines, no longer serves the reality of how technology companies grow and mature. This structural evolution suggests that the industry’s problems run deeper than just too much capital—they’re embedded in the very frameworks that govern how venture operates.
Perhaps the most sobering takeaway from Botha’s critique is what it reveals about our broader innovation economy. When venture capital becomes “return-free risk,” it’s not just investors who suffer—it’s the entire ecosystem of entrepreneurs, employees, and society that benefits from genuine technological progress. The abundance of capital chasing too few quality opportunities means that mediocre ideas get funded while truly transformative ones might get lost in the noise. As we stand at the precipice of another technological revolution driven by AI, Botha’s warning serves as a crucial reminder that sustainable innovation requires more than just capital—it demands discipline, discernment, and a willingness to confront uncomfortable truths about what actually creates value.
About the Author
