There’s something fascinating about watching two shows from the same genre, released around the same time, take dramatically different paths to success. Squid Game exploded into a global cultural phenomenon, while Alice in Borderland settled into the comfortable role of cult favorite. Both series feature deadly games, desperate characters fighting for survival, and social commentary woven throughout their narratives. Yet one captured the world’s imagination while the other found a dedicated but smaller audience. The difference isn’t necessarily about quality—it’s about resonance and accessibility.
What made Squid Game connect so deeply with audiences worldwide was its brutal simplicity. The games themselves were childhood pastimes familiar to people across cultures—Red Light Green Light, tug-of-war, marbles. This accessibility meant viewers could immediately understand the stakes without needing complex explanations. Meanwhile, Alice in Borderland often features games with elaborate rules and supernatural elements that require significant mental investment from the audience. While intellectually stimulating, this complexity creates a barrier to entry that Squid Game cleverly avoided. The Korean series understood that emotional investment comes before intellectual engagement.
The thematic focus of each show also explains their different trajectories. Squid Game tapped directly into universal anxieties about capitalism, debt, and economic inequality. These are concerns that transcend national borders and cultural contexts. When characters debated whether to risk their lives for money they desperately needed, viewers around the world understood that desperation. Alice in Borderland, while equally thoughtful, explores more existential themes about finding purpose and identity in a chaotic world. These are compelling ideas, but they don’t have the same immediate, gut-level connection that economic survival provides.
Character development reveals another key distinction between the two series. Squid Game took its time building relationships and backstories, allowing viewers to form emotional attachments to characters before they faced mortal danger. We learned why each person ended up in the games, making their struggles feel personal and their losses genuinely heartbreaking. Alice in Borderland often moves at a faster pace, prioritizing the mystery of the Borderland over deep character exploration. Both approaches have merit, but Squid Game’s method created the emotional stakes that kept audiences invested beyond the spectacle of the games themselves.
As both franchises continue with new seasons, it’s worth considering whether Alice in Borderland’s recent narrative choices—described by some critics as going ‘full Squid Game’—represent a creative misstep or an attempt to capture broader appeal. The danger lies in losing what made the series unique in the first place. What makes these death game stories compelling isn’t just the life-or-death competition, but the distinct perspectives they bring to the genre. Squid Game succeeded by being authentically itself, not by copying what came before it.
Ultimately, the divergent paths of these two series remind us that cultural phenomena are rarely predictable. Sometimes a show captures the zeitgeist in ways that can’t be engineered or replicated. Squid Game arrived at exactly the right moment with exactly the right combination of elements to become a global sensation. Alice in Borderland, while equally brilliant in its own way, serves a different purpose—proving that there’s room in the streaming landscape for both blockbuster hits and beloved cult classics. Both shows have enriched the death game genre, each offering something valuable to different types of viewers. Perhaps the real victory isn’t in becoming the next Squid Game, but in creating something that resonates deeply with the audience it was meant for.
About the Author
