In the streaming era’s crowded landscape, two shows have emerged as unlikely siblings in the survival game genre, each holding up a different mirror to our collective anxieties. Alice in Borderland and Squid Game arrived on the scene like twins separated at birth, both exploring the brutal mathematics of human desperation through deadly competitions. Yet as I’ve watched their trajectories unfold, I’ve come to see them not as competitors but as complementary visions of the same dark fantasy—one that speaks volumes about how we process fear, competition, and the very nature of survival in our increasingly gamified world.
Where Squid Game grounds its terror in the familiar—childhood games twisted into instruments of death—Alice in Borderland embraces the fantastical with its parallel Tokyo and laser executions from the sky. This fundamental difference in approach reveals something crucial about their respective appeals. Squid Game works because it takes what we know and love and makes it terrifying, creating that unsettling feeling of nostalgia weaponized. Alice in Borderland, by contrast, builds its tension through intellectual puzzles and complex game mechanics that demand active engagement from viewers. One show asks us to feel the horror of the familiar made deadly; the other challenges us to solve the puzzle alongside its characters.
The character dynamics in these two series couldn’t be more different, and this is where I find the most compelling distinction. Squid Game gives us characters who feel like people we might know—flawed, desperate individuals whose backstories unfold gradually, creating emotional investment through shared humanity. Alice in Borderland, while featuring compelling protagonists, often prioritizes the games themselves over deep character development. This isn’t necessarily a weakness—it’s a different storytelling philosophy. One believes we care most about who survives; the other believes we care most about how they survive.
What fascinates me most about these shows is how they reflect our current cultural moment. We live in an age where gaming culture has permeated every aspect of life, from fitness apps that turn exercise into quests to dating apps that gamify romance. Both series tap into this zeitgeist, but they approach it from opposite directions. Squid Game shows us how brutal life can become when reduced to simple games, while Alice in Borderland demonstrates how complex games can reveal the complexities of human nature. One suggests that simplicity reveals truth; the other argues that complexity does.
As I reflect on these two remarkable series, I’m struck by how they’ve become more than just entertainment—they’re cultural artifacts that help us process our relationship with competition, survival, and human connection in an increasingly disconnected world. The debate over which is “better” misses the point entirely. Like two different lenses on the same camera, they offer distinct but equally valuable perspectives on the human condition under extreme pressure. Their enduring popularity suggests we’re not just watching for the thrills—we’re searching for something deeper about ourselves and the games we play, both on screen and in life.
About the Author
