There’s something magical happening at the intersection of childhood nostalgia and adult ingenuity. When Lego released their Game Boy set, they created a beautiful tribute—a sculpture that captured the iconic handheld’s form but lacked its function. Now, two competing visions are emerging to breathe life into these plastic bricks, and they represent fundamentally different philosophies about what makes retro gaming special. Natalie the Nerd’s approach feels like digital archaeology, carefully extracting the actual soul of Game Boy systems and transplanting it into Lego’s shell, while the BrickBoy team takes the practical route of software emulation. Both are remarkable achievements, but they speak to different kinds of preservationists.
Natalie’s Build A Boy kit represents what I’d call the purist’s path. By harvesting authentic Nintendo chips from Game Boy Pocket systems and designing custom circuit boards smaller than the original cartridges, she’s not just making something that plays games—she’s preserving the actual hardware DNA. There’s a beautiful madness to this approach that resonates with anyone who’s ever held a Game Boy and felt that specific tactile feedback, heard that distinctive startup sound, or experienced the slight resistance when inserting a cartridge. Her method respects the original engineering while recontextualizing it within modern maker culture. The fact that she’s planning a no-soldering drop-in kit makes this preservation accessible, turning what could be a destructive modification into something almost reverential.
Meanwhile, the BrickBoy team offers what might be called the pragmatist’s solution. Their emulation-based approach acknowledges the reality that original cartridges are becoming increasingly scarce and expensive. By focusing on ROM files and software emulation, they’re preserving the gaming experience rather than the hardware itself. There’s something democratizing about this approach—it doesn’t require hunting down vintage games or sacrificing original Game Boy systems. The three-tiered pricing structure, from essential grayscale gaming to full Game Boy Advance compatibility, shows an understanding that different users have different needs and budgets. It’s gaming preservation through accessibility rather than authenticity.
What fascinates me most about this competition is how it mirrors larger conversations in retro gaming and preservation communities. The purist versus pragmatist debate extends far beyond Lego Game Boys—it’s about whether we value the original hardware experience or the software accessibility more. Natalie’s approach speaks to those who believe the magic is in the physical interaction with authentic components, while BrickBoy appeals to those who prioritize playing the games themselves, regardless of the underlying technology. Both are valid perspectives, and both contribute to keeping gaming history alive in their own ways.
As these kits prepare for their 2026 and late-2025 launches respectively, I find myself wondering about the future of such hybrid creations. We’re witnessing the birth of a new category—nostalgia-driven maker projects that blend modern accessibility with vintage authenticity. These aren’t just mods; they’re conversations between generations of technology, between childhood memories and adult capabilities. Whether you choose the chip-harvesting authenticity of Build A Boy or the convenient emulation of BrickBoy, you’re participating in something larger than just playing old games—you’re helping redefine what preservation means in the digital age, one plastic brick at a time.
About the Author
