In a recent interview that’s been making waves across gaming communities, Final Fantasy 7 Remake trilogy director Naoki Hamaguchi dropped what might be the most honest assessment of modern gaming culture I’ve heard in years. While discussing fan feedback about Rebirth’s pacing, he didn’t just defend his creative choices—he pointed a finger right back at us, the players. “I feel like nowadays, players just have too much to do and too much to play,” he observed, suggesting that our collective impatience with longer game sections stems not from poor design, but from our own overwhelmed gaming libraries and limited attention spans. This isn’t just a developer deflecting criticism; it’s a profound insight into how the gaming landscape has fundamentally changed how we consume and experience games.
Hamaguchi’s comments reveal something fascinating about the creative tension between artistic vision and audience reception. He stands by Rebirth’s pacing, stating that “the content and balance in Rebirth is exactly as I wanted it,” yet he’s still listening to player feedback for the trilogy’s conclusion. This isn’t a contradiction—it’s the mark of a thoughtful creator who understands that while his artistic instincts might be sound, the context in which players experience his work has shifted dramatically. The director who’s spent more time “looking at the back of Cloud than anyone in my actual family” clearly has deep conviction about his creative choices, but also recognizes that games exist in conversation with their audience.
What’s particularly compelling about this situation is how it reflects broader trends in gaming culture. We’re living in an era of unprecedented abundance—subscription services, constant sales, and an endless stream of new releases have created a gaming environment where completion becomes more important than immersion. When every game competes for our limited time, we develop what I call “content anxiety”—the nagging feeling that we should be moving on to the next thing rather than sinking deeply into the current experience. Hamaguchi has essentially diagnosed this modern condition, and his team’s response—making Part Three “more concise” while maintaining artistic integrity—shows a sophisticated understanding of this new reality.
The irony here is that many of us fell in love with RPGs precisely because they offered expansive worlds and lengthy narratives that demanded our full attention. The original Final Fantasy 7 was celebrated for its epic scope and willingness to take its time developing characters and world-building. Now, as we approach the conclusion of this ambitious remake project, we’re seeing the creative team navigate the delicate balance between honoring that legacy and adapting to contemporary player expectations. It’s a reminder that game development isn’t just about creating art—it’s about understanding how that art will be received in a constantly evolving cultural context.
As we await the final chapter of this beloved trilogy, Hamaguchi’s reflections offer us an opportunity to examine our own relationship with gaming. Are we truly too busy, or have we simply forgotten how to be patient with the stories we claim to love? The director’s commitment to “striking a balance” in Part Three serves as a mirror to our own consumption habits. Perhaps the most valuable takeaway isn’t just about how the next game will be paced, but about how we might recalibrate our approach to gaming itself—learning to savor experiences rather than rushing through them, and recognizing that sometimes the most rewarding journeys are the ones that take their time.
About the Author
