In the world of retro gaming, we’re witnessing something truly remarkable unfold—a battle between two different philosophies of preservation and play, all centered around Lego’s surprisingly popular Game Boy set. On one side stands Natalie the Nerd, an Australian modder who’s taking the purist approach by cramming actual Nintendo chips into the plastic brick replica. On the other, the BrickBoy team offers an emulation-based solution that promises convenience without the need to sacrifice vintage hardware. What fascinates me isn’t just the technical achievement, but what these competing approaches say about how we value authenticity in our digital nostalgia.
Natalie’s Build A Boy kit represents something of a technical marvel—a custom circuit board smaller than a Game Boy cartridge that somehow manages to house harvested Nintendo chips from Game Boy Pocket systems. The fact that she’s making this available as a drop-in upgrade requiring no soldering speaks volumes about her commitment to accessibility. There’s something deeply satisfying about the idea of using real Nintendo hardware within a Lego shell—it’s like building a modern temple around ancient artifacts. The $99 price point feels surprisingly reasonable given the complexity of sourcing and integrating authentic components.
Meanwhile, the BrickBoy kit takes a completely different approach, opting for emulation rather than original hardware. While purists might scoff at the idea of playing ROMs instead of actual cartridges, there’s an undeniable appeal to having a self-contained module that slots right into the Lego Game Boy’s cartridge slot. The three-tiered offering—from basic Game Boy support to full Game Boy Advance compatibility—shows thoughtful consideration of different user needs. The sustainability argument is compelling too: no vintage Game Boys need to be sacrificed for this approach.
What strikes me most about this emerging competition is how it mirrors broader debates in retro gaming preservation. Natalie’s approach honors the original hardware in its purest form, treating the Nintendo chips as sacred artifacts that must be preserved and utilized. The BrickBoy team, launching their Kickstarter just days from now, represents a more pragmatic view—that the experience matters more than the components. Both approaches have merit, and both reflect different ways we connect with gaming history.
As someone who’s watched the retro gaming scene evolve, I find this particular moment especially poignant. We’re not just talking about playing old games—we’re discussing how we preserve and interact with gaming heritage. Natalie’s warning that her creation “won’t be something you’ll want to play every day” acknowledges the limitations of authenticity, while the BrickBoy’s promise of daily usability speaks to modern expectations. Both approaches represent valid ways of keeping gaming history alive, and the fact that they’re emerging simultaneously suggests there’s room in the market—and in our hearts—for both preservation methods.
About the Author
