There’s something deeply poetic happening in the world of retro gaming right now, a collision of childhood memories and modern ingenuity that feels almost like time travel. Two separate projects are racing to transform Lego’s decorative Game Boy set into something that actually plays games, but they’re approaching this challenge from fundamentally different philosophical positions. On one side, we have Natalie the Nerd’s Build A Boy kit, which uses authentic Nintendo chips harvested from Game Boy Pocket systems, creating what amounts to a Frankenstein’s monster of gaming nostalgia. On the other, the BrickBoy kit takes the emulation route, building everything from scratch while preserving the original Lego set intact. Both approaches reveal fascinating truths about what we value in our relationship with gaming history.
Natalie’s Build A Boy represents the purist’s dream—a quest for authenticity that borders on the obsessive. The fact that she’s using real Nintendo chips feels like a statement about the importance of preserving the original gaming experience, even if it means sacrificing actual Game Boy Pocket systems in the process. There’s something almost sacred about this approach, as if the soul of the original hardware must be present for the experience to be genuine. Her custom circuit board, smaller than a Game Boy cartridge, represents an incredible feat of engineering that honors the original design while pushing it into new territory. This isn’t just about playing games; it’s about resurrecting the very essence of what made the Game Boy magical.
Meanwhile, the BrickBoy kit represents a different kind of reverence—one that prioritizes preservation over authenticity. By using emulation and custom components, this approach doesn’t require the sacrifice of original hardware, making it arguably more sustainable and accessible. The three-tiered offering—from basic grayscale Game Boy functionality to full Game Boy Advance support—shows an understanding that different users want different levels of functionality from their nostalgic experiences. The inclusion of modern features like Bluetooth connectivity and rechargeable batteries acknowledges that while we love the past, we also appreciate the conveniences of the present.
What fascinates me most about this competition is how it mirrors broader debates in retro gaming culture. The authenticity versus accessibility argument has been raging for years, from debates about CRT monitors versus modern displays to arguments about original hardware versus software emulation. These Lego Game Boy projects crystallize that debate in a particularly compelling way because they’re literally building the argument brick by brick. Both approaches have merit, and both speak to different aspects of why we care about preserving gaming history in the first place.
Ultimately, what both projects demonstrate is that our relationship with gaming nostalgia is evolving. We’re no longer content to simply display these artifacts as museum pieces—we want to interact with them, to make them our own, to bridge the gap between the toys that shaped our childhoods and the technology that defines our present. Whether through the surgical precision of Natalie’s authentic hardware integration or the clever engineering of BrickBoy’s emulation solution, we’re finding new ways to keep these memories alive and relevant. The fact that both approaches can coexist and thrive suggests that there’s room in our hearts for multiple kinds of preservation, multiple ways of honoring the past while building toward the future.
About the Author
