There’s a specter haunting television writers’ rooms across Hollywood, and its name is Game of Thrones. Finn Wolfhard’s recent admission that the Stranger Things cast was “pretty worried” about their finale being torn apart like the HBO juggernaut’s final season reveals something profound about our current television landscape. We’ve entered an era where the pressure to stick the landing has become almost unbearable, where every series finale now carries the weight of not just concluding its own story, but avoiding the cultural trauma inflicted by previous disappointments. The Duffer Brothers and their young cast aren’t just telling a story anymore—they’re navigating a minefield of audience expectations shaped by past failures.
What’s particularly fascinating about Wolfhard’s comments is the psychological shift he describes. The initial anxiety, born from witnessing Game of Thrones’ brutal public execution, gave way to confidence after reading the scripts. This suggests that the Stranger Things team isn’t just aware of the pressure—they’re actively working against it. They understand that the key to avoiding a Game of Thrones-style backlash isn’t about fan service or playing it safe, but about delivering something that feels earned and authentic to the story they’ve been telling for nearly a decade. The Duffers’ promise that Season 5 will feel like “eight blockbuster movies” while maintaining a “deeply personal story” shows they’re trying to balance spectacle with substance.
Game of Thrones’ legacy as a cautionary tale is particularly ironic given its initial reputation for bold, unpredictable storytelling. The same qualities that made the show revolutionary in its early seasons—its willingness to subvert expectations and kill beloved characters—became liabilities in its final stretch. Now, every showrunner approaching their series finale must grapple with this paradox: how to be surprising without being disappointing, how to subvert expectations without betraying the story’s core. The Stranger Things team’s awareness of this delicate balance might actually work in their favor, forcing them to be more deliberate and thoughtful about their choices.
Wolfhard’s perspective is especially poignant given that he’s literally grown up on this show. Having spent nearly half his life playing Mike Wheeler, his investment in the character and the story runs deeper than just professional pride. When he talks about the cast’s collective relief after reading the scripts, it feels genuine because these aren’t just actors collecting paychecks—they’re people who’ve shared a formative experience. Their concern about the finale isn’t just about ratings or critical reception; it’s about honoring the journey they’ve all been on together, both on-screen and off.
The broader implication here extends far beyond Stranger Things. We’re living through a golden age of television where shows become cultural touchstones, and their finales become collective experiences that can define how we remember entire eras of pop culture. The pressure to get it right has never been higher, and the stakes have never been more personal for both creators and audiences. As we approach the end of Stranger Things, we’re not just watching a show conclude—we’re participating in a cultural moment that will either validate or challenge our faith in long-form storytelling. The ghost of Westeros may haunt every writer’s room, but perhaps that haunting is exactly what we need to ensure that future finales receive the care and consideration they deserve.
About the Author
