There’s a specter haunting Hollywood, and its name is Game of Thrones. Nearly five years after its controversial finale, the shadow of Westeros still looms large over every major television production approaching its conclusion. The latest to feel this pressure is Netflix’s Stranger Things, whose star Finn Wolfhard recently admitted the cast was “pretty worried” about suffering the same fate as the fantasy epic that was “torn to shreds” by fans and critics alike. This isn’t just about one actor’s nerves—it’s a symptom of a broader cultural phenomenon where final episodes have become make-or-break moments that can retroactively taint an entire series’ legacy.
What’s fascinating about Wolfhard’s admission isn’t the fear itself, but the specific comparison he draws. Game of Thrones wasn’t just a bad finale—it was a cultural event that transformed how we talk about television endings. Before 2019, a disappointing conclusion might earn some grumbling and negative reviews. After Game of Thrones, it became a full-scale cultural reckoning, complete with petitions, viral memes, and endless think pieces dissecting every misstep. The stakes have been permanently raised, and every showrunner now knows they’re not just crafting an ending—they’re competing with the ghost of what could have been.
The psychology behind this collective anxiety reveals something profound about our relationship with long-form storytelling. We invest years—sometimes decades—in these fictional worlds and their inhabitants. For the Stranger Things cast, who’ve grown up on screen together since 2015, the pressure is doubly intense. They’re not just saying goodbye to characters; they’re closing a chapter of their own lives. When Wolfhard mentions having given “over slightly less than half of his life” to the show, he’s articulating the emotional weight that makes a bad ending feel like personal betrayal rather than mere creative disappointment.
What gives me hope for Stranger Things’ conclusion is Wolfhard’s crucial follow-up: “But then we read the scripts. We knew that it was something special.” This distinction matters. Game of Thrones suffered from what felt like a fundamental misunderstanding of its own characters and themes in its final stretch. The Duffer Brothers, by contrast, have been building toward this conclusion from the beginning. They’re not adapting someone else’s unfinished work—they’re completing their own vision. There’s a coherence to creator-driven stories that often eludes adaptations when they outpace their source material.
As we approach Stranger Things’ final season this November, we’re witnessing more than just the end of a popular show. We’re participating in a cultural test case: Can any series in the streaming era stick the landing? The answer will shape not just how we remember Hawkins, Indiana, but how future shows approach their own conclusions. The pressure Wolfhard describes isn’t just about avoiding negative reviews—it’s about preserving the emotional truth of a story that has meant so much to so many. In an age of endless content and fleeting attention, a satisfying ending might be the rarest treasure of all.
About the Author
