There’s something profoundly human about the impulse to preserve what’s been forgotten. In an era where digital content seems both permanent and disposable, the story of Juan’s 19-year quest to resurrect Conquer—a multiplayer game from the late 1980s—feels like something out of an Indiana Jones adventure for the digital age. This wasn’t just about recovering code; it was about salvaging a piece of gaming’s collective memory, a precursor to the multiplayer experiences we now take for granted. When Juan realized this intellectual ancestor was slipping into oblivion, with source code scattered across archives and rights unclear, he became a digital archaeologist determined to piece together gaming’s fragmented history.
What strikes me most about this story is the timing. Conquer emerged during that magical period when writing multiplayer software was still rare and revolutionary. Today, we live in an always-connected world where multiplayer gaming is the norm rather than the exception, but in the late 80s and early 90s, this was cutting-edge territory. The game represents a bridge between the isolated computing experiences of early personal computers and the interconnected digital worlds we inhabit today. It’s easy to forget how radical the concept of connecting players across distances was at a time when most gaming still happened in arcades or on single-player consoles.
The connection to traditional games like conkers adds another layer to this preservation story. The uncertainty around the name’s origins—whether from “conquer” or the French “conque” for conch shells—mirrors the uncertainty surrounding early digital artifacts. Just as children’s games evolved from snail shells on strings to horse chestnuts, our digital entertainment has transformed in ways we couldn’t have imagined. There’s poetry in how both physical and digital games risk being lost to time, their rules and mechanics fading as generations pass and technologies become obsolete.
This preservation effort speaks to a larger cultural moment where we’re beginning to recognize digital artifacts as worthy of the same careful stewardship we apply to physical historical objects. The comparison to door games like L.O.R.D. (Legend of the Red Dragon) that commenters mentioned highlights how entire ecosystems of early online culture are vanishing. These weren’t just games; they were social spaces, communities built around dial-up connections and bulletin board systems. Preserving Conquer isn’t just about saving code—it’s about maintaining access to the social and technological contexts that shaped early digital interaction.
As I reflect on this digital resurrection story, I’m struck by how much of our recent history exists in this precarious state between permanence and oblivion. The video game industry has already experienced one major crash in 1983, with unsold cartridges literally buried in landfills, and we risk similar losses in the digital realm as formats become unreadable and platforms shut down. Juan’s dedication over nearly two decades reminds us that preserving our digital heritage requires both technical skill and profound patience. In an age of rapid technological turnover, perhaps the most radical act is to look backward, to ensure that the foundations of our digital present remain accessible to future generations who might wonder how we got here.
About the Author
