There’s something uniquely revealing about the way we categorize sports knowledge in our minds. The recent NYT Connections Sports Edition puzzle, with its mix of swimming pool accessories, NFL divisions, Texas college teams, and hockey nicknames, serves as a fascinating Rorschach test for sports fans. It’s not just about what we know, but how our brains organize the sprawling universe of sports information. The fact that someone can instantly connect ‘noodle’ and ‘tube’ with pool equipment while simultaneously recognizing ‘Sid the Kid’ as Sidney Crosby speaks to the wonderfully chaotic filing system we all maintain for our sports obsession.
What struck me most about this particular puzzle was how it perfectly captured the different levels of sports fandom. The yellow category—pool items like lifeguard, noodle, towel, and tube—represents the universal sports experience. These are things anyone who’s ever been to a public pool or taken swimming lessons would recognize. It’s the entry-level knowledge that connects casual observers to the sports world. Meanwhile, the green category’s AFC South teams (Houston, Indianapolis, Jacksonville, Tennessee) requires a more dedicated level of NFL fandom, the kind of knowledge that separates Sunday viewers from fantasy football commissioners.
The puzzle’s progression into more specialized territory with Texas college teams and NHL nicknames illustrates how sports fandom becomes increasingly tribal and nuanced. Knowing Baylor, Rice, SMU, and Texas Tech as Texas college programs suggests either regional loyalty or serious college sports enthusiasm. But the purple category—NHL player nicknames like McJesus (Connor McDavid), Ovi (Alexander Ovechkin), Pasta (David Pastrnak), and Sid the Kid (Sidney Crosby)—represents the deepest level of insider knowledge. These aren’t just players; they’re cultural touchstones within hockey circles, the kind of nicknames that emerge organically from fan communities and stick through generations.
This puzzle structure mirrors how we actually develop as sports fans. We start with broad, accessible knowledge (the pool equipment), then branch into specific leagues and divisions, then into regional specialties, and finally into the intimate language of die-hard communities. It’s a progression from spectator to participant in the culture of the sport. The fact that these categories are ranked by difficulty in the game reflects real-world hierarchies of sports knowledge—what’s common versus what requires genuine immersion in a particular sports ecosystem.
Ultimately, games like Connections Sports Edition do more than just test our knowledge—they celebrate the beautiful complexity of sports fandom itself. They remind us that being a sports fan isn’t a binary state but a spectrum of engagement, with room for casual observers and obsessive experts alike. The next time you find yourself struggling to connect seemingly random sports terms, remember that you’re participating in the same mental gymnastics that make sports fandom such a rich, layered experience. It’s not just about knowing the answers—it’s about understanding how all these pieces fit together in the grand tapestry of sports culture.
About the Author
