There’s something almost Shakespearean about watching a manager stand on the touchline while thousands of voices chant for his dismissal after just 23 days in the job. Ange Postecoglou, the Australian manager who arrived at Nottingham Forest with a reputation for building teams with identity and purpose, now finds himself in the peculiar position of having to defend a process that hasn’t even had time to begin. The chants of “you’re getting sacked in the morning” that echoed through the City Ground following Forest’s Europa League defeat to Midtjylland represent more than just fan frustration—they’re a symptom of modern football’s accelerated crisis culture, where patience has become the rarest commodity in the game.
What’s particularly striking about this situation is Postecoglou’s response, which feels almost detached from the immediate emotional turmoil surrounding him. His comments about “nothing surprising me in football anymore” and “the climate we’re in” suggest a man who has accepted the inherent absurdity of his profession. There’s a certain wisdom in this perspective—an understanding that managerial careers in today’s game are often measured in months rather than years, and that public opinion can turn on a single result. Yet there’s also something deeply concerning about a culture where a manager can be written off before he’s had a chance to implement his ideas, before the players have fully grasped his system, before anything resembling a team identity has taken shape.
The irony here is palpable. Postecoglou was brought in precisely because of his reputation for long-term thinking and philosophical consistency. His success at Celtic and his work in Australia were built on clear principles and gradual development. Now he finds himself in an environment where gradual development is treated as a luxury the club cannot afford. The Forest supporters, understandably frustrated by years of instability and underachievement, want immediate solutions to problems that have festered for seasons. Their anger is real and justified, but it’s being directed at a man who represents the very stability they claim to crave.
This situation raises uncomfortable questions about what we expect from modern football managers. Are they miracle workers who can instantly transform struggling teams, or are they architects who need time to build something sustainable? The evidence suggests we want both simultaneously—immediate results and long-term vision, instant success and gradual development. Postecoglou’s insistence that he “really believes in the process” and that Forest aren’t “far away from being the team that can get the results we need” feels like a voice from a different era, one where managers were given seasons rather than weeks to prove their worth.
Ultimately, the Postecoglou saga at Nottingham Forest serves as a microcosm of modern football’s identity crisis. We celebrate managers with philosophy and vision, then demand they abandon those principles at the first sign of trouble. We criticize clubs for lacking long-term planning, then call for new managers after a handful of poor results. Postecoglou may well be the wrong man for Forest, but we’ll never know if we don’t give him the time to be the right one. His calm demeanor in the face of early criticism suggests he understands this paradox better than most—that in today’s football, sometimes the bravest thing a manager can do is ignore the noise and trust the process, even when everyone around him has lost faith in both.
About the Author
