When Squid Game exploded onto the global stage in 2021, it didn’t just break streaming records—it created a cultural phenomenon that made death games mainstream. Almost immediately, comparisons began swirling around Alice in Borderland, Netflix’s other major survival thriller that had premiered a year earlier. While both shows feature characters fighting for their lives in deadly competitions, the comparison often does a disservice to both series, overlooking their fundamentally different approaches to storytelling, character development, and thematic exploration.
The surface-level similarities are undeniable: both feature desperate people thrust into life-or-death situations where they must compete in games to survive. But where Squid Game grounds itself in the brutal reality of economic desperation and childhood nostalgia turned deadly, Alice in Borderland embraces the surreal and fantastical. The former uses familiar playground games as its killing fields, creating a chilling contrast between innocence and brutality. The latter builds elaborate, often impossible challenges that feel more like video game levels than real-world activities. This distinction isn’t just cosmetic—it fundamentally shapes how we engage with each story and what emotional responses they evoke.
Character development reveals another crucial divergence between the two series. Squid Game presents us with deeply flawed, relatable characters whose motivations stem from real-world financial desperation. We understand why Seong Gi-hun gambles away his daughter’s birthday money, why Cho Sang-woo betrays his friends, and why Kang Sae-byeok risks everything to bring her family to South Korea. Their struggles mirror economic anxieties that resonate globally. Alice in Borderland, by contrast, gives us characters who are essentially blank slates thrown into an impossible situation. Their development happens through the games themselves rather than through their pre-existing circumstances, creating a different kind of emotional investment—one based on how they adapt to their new reality rather than who they were before it.
The cultural reception of these two shows tells its own fascinating story. Squid Game became a global sensation almost overnight, while Alice in Borderland developed a more dedicated but smaller following. This discrepancy speaks volumes about accessibility and cultural resonance. Squid Game’s themes of economic inequality and the desperation of modern capitalism struck a universal chord, while Alice in Borderland’s more abstract, puzzle-oriented approach appealed to a different demographic. It’s not that one is inherently better—they simply satisfy different viewing appetites. Some audiences crave the raw social commentary of Squid Game, while others prefer the intellectual challenge and world-building of Alice in Borderland.
Ultimately, the debate over which show is “better” misses the point entirely. Both series succeed on their own terms and serve different purposes within the survival genre. Squid Game holds up a mirror to our society’s deepest anxieties about money, class, and human nature under pressure. Alice in Borderland offers an escape into a meticulously constructed alternate reality where the rules of our world no longer apply. One asks us to confront uncomfortable truths about our economic systems, while the other invites us to lose ourselves in a high-stakes puzzle box. The beauty of having both shows available is that viewers can choose which type of survival story resonates with them most—or enjoy both for their unique strengths.
About the Author
