There’s a specter haunting television writers’ rooms across Hollywood, and its name is Game of Thrones. The recent revelation from Stranger Things star Finn Wolfhard about the cast’s collective anxiety over their final season speaks to a broader cultural phenomenon that has fundamentally changed how we approach television endings. When Wolfhard admitted that everyone was ‘pretty worried’ about avoiding a Thrones-level backlash, he wasn’t just expressing personal concern—he was articulating the new reality of prestige television in the post-Thrones era. The pressure to stick the landing has never been higher, and the shadow of that divisive finale looms over every ambitious series approaching its conclusion.
What’s particularly fascinating about this anxiety is that it represents a fundamental shift in how creators view their relationship with audiences. In the past, television finales were certainly important, but they didn’t carry the same existential weight. Shows could have mediocre endings and still be remembered fondly for their earlier brilliance. But Game of Thrones demonstrated that a poorly received finale could retroactively taint an entire series’ legacy, creating a cultural memory that overwrites years of quality storytelling. The Stranger Things team isn’t just worried about disappointing fans—they’re worried about becoming the next cautionary tale, the next example cited in think pieces about how not to end a beloved series.
Wolfhard’s comments about reading the scripts and feeling reassured point to something crucial about the creative process: the importance of internal confidence. When a cast that’s been living with these characters for nearly a decade reads the final chapters and feels they’re ‘something special,’ that’s more than just professional optimism. It suggests the Duffer Brothers have managed to maintain creative integrity while navigating the immense pressure of fan expectations. This balance is perhaps the most challenging aspect of modern television—honoring the story you set out to tell while acknowledging that millions of viewers have developed their own ideas about how it should conclude.
The comparison to Game of Thrones is particularly apt because both shows represent different eras of television dominance. Game of Thrones was the watercooler show of its time, the series that everyone watched and discussed, much like Stranger Things has become for the streaming generation. Both shows built intricate worlds with complex mythology, and both faced the challenge of wrapping up multiple character arcs and plot threads in a satisfying way. The key difference, and perhaps the reason for the Stranger Things team’s cautious optimism, lies in the Duffers’ approach—they’ve apparently had the endgame planned for years, suggesting a more cohesive narrative vision than the improvisational quality that sometimes characterized Thrones’ later seasons.
As we await the final season of Stranger Things, Wolfhard’s candid admission serves as a reminder of the human element behind these massive productions. These aren’t just corporate products being churned out—they’re passion projects that have defined the lives of their creators and cast for nearly a decade. The fear of letting down the audience, of failing to honor the characters and world they’ve built, is clearly palpable. Yet there’s something hopeful in their belief that they’ve found the right ending. In an age where every finale feels like a referendum on an entire series’ worth of storytelling, perhaps the best we can hope for is that creators approach their conclusions with the same care and intention that made us fall in love with their stories in the first place.
About the Author
