In the streaming era’s crowded landscape, two shows have become inextricably linked in the public consciousness: Alice in Borderland and Squid Game. The comparison feels almost inevitable—both feature deadly games, desperate participants, and high-stakes survival scenarios. Yet this constant juxtaposition reveals more about our viewing habits than it does about the shows themselves. We’ve become conditioned to categorize content into neat little boxes, forcing complex narratives into simplistic binaries of better versus worse, original versus derivative. The truth, as always, exists somewhere in the nuanced space between these extremes.
What fascinates me most about this comparison isn’t the shows’ similarities but our collective need to declare a winner. We approach these narratives like sports teams, picking sides and defending our choices with passionate intensity. The YouTube debates, the Reddit threads, the endless social media discussions—they all point to a deeper human desire to rank and categorize art. Yet both series succeed for entirely different reasons. Squid Game captured global attention with its brutal commentary on capitalism and its hauntingly familiar childhood games turned deadly. Alice in Borderland, meanwhile, offers a more cerebral experience, diving deep into psychological survival and the mechanics of its intricate game world.
The timing of their releases has undoubtedly fueled the comparison fire. Alice in Borderland’s second season arrived in Squid Game’s massive shadow, while its third season followed months after Squid Game’s conclusion. This scheduling created an artificial rivalry, as if Netflix itself was positioning them as competitors in the death game genre. But this framing does both shows a disservice. They’re not competing for the same emotional territory—they’re exploring different corners of the same thematic universe. One holds up a mirror to society’s economic inequalities; the other examines the human psyche under extreme duress.
Where Squid Game excels in social commentary and emotional resonance, Alice in Borderland thrives in its game design complexity and world-building. The Borderland’s games feel like intricate puzzles designed by a sadistic game master, each with its own twisted logic and psychological traps. This isn’t about nostalgia or childhood memories—it’s about pure survival instinct and intellectual endurance. The tension in Alice in Borderland comes from watching characters navigate impossible scenarios using their wits rather than relying on emotional connections or moral dilemmas. It’s a different kind of suspense, one that rewards careful observation and strategic thinking.
Perhaps the most telling aspect of this ongoing comparison is what it reveals about our consumption of international content. Both shows represent a significant shift in global entertainment, proving that compelling stories transcend language barriers and cultural contexts. Yet we still struggle to appreciate them on their own terms. We want to fit them into familiar frameworks, to compare them to what we already know. The real victory here isn’t which show comes out on top, but that both have found audiences willing to engage with complex, challenging narratives from different cultural perspectives. In the end, the only game that matters is the one where we all win—the expansion of our storytelling horizons.
About the Author
