There’s something magical happening at the intersection of childhood nostalgia and modern maker culture that feels almost too perfect to be real. Two iconic pillars of 90s play—Lego’s creative building system and Nintendo’s revolutionary Game Boy—are colliding in ways that would have blown our younger minds. What started as Lego’s charming but static replica of the classic handheld has now sparked a fascinating competition between two distinct philosophies of preservation and play. On one side, we have Natalie the Nerd’s Build A Boy kit, which seeks to resurrect actual Nintendo hardware within plastic bricks, while on the other, the BrickBoy offers a more sustainable emulation-based approach. This isn’t just about playing games—it’s a philosophical debate about what constitutes authenticity in our digital age.
Natalie’s approach feels like digital archaeology meets mad science. By harvesting chips from actual Game Boy Pocket systems and designing a custom circuit board smaller than a standard cartridge, she’s essentially performing technological necromancy. There’s something deeply compelling about this preservationist mindset—the idea that the original hardware, with all its quirks and limitations, deserves to live on. Her method requires no soldering, making it accessible to hobbyists who might otherwise be intimidated by electronics work. Yet there’s an inherent tension here: to give new life to one Game Boy, another must be sacrificed. It’s the retro gaming equivalent of organ donation, raising questions about the ethics of preservation versus the cost of resurrection.
Meanwhile, the BrickBoy team takes a different path entirely—one that feels more forward-looking while still honoring the past. Their self-contained module slots into the Lego Game Boy’s cartridge slot and relies on emulation rather than original hardware. This approach has its own compelling advantages: no vintage systems need to be dismantled, and the functionality expands beyond what the original hardware could achieve. The ability to play Game Boy Color and Game Boy Advance titles on what appears to be an original Game Boy creates a delightful cognitive dissonance. It’s the technological equivalent of finding a secret room in your childhood home—the familiar exterior hides unexpected capabilities.
What fascinates me most about this competition is how it mirrors broader cultural conversations about authenticity in the digital age. Natalie’s Build A Boy represents the purist’s approach—the belief that there’s something irreplaceable about original hardware, that the experience isn’t complete without the actual chips that powered our childhood adventures. The BrickBoy, in contrast, embraces the idea that the spirit of the experience matters more than the specific components. Both approaches have merit, and both speak to different aspects of why we cherish these relics from gaming’s past. It’s not merely about playing the games—it’s about connecting with the physical artifacts that defined an era.
As we watch these two projects develop—Natalie’s through Crowd Supply in early 2026 and the BrickBoy through its October Kickstarter—we’re witnessing more than just product launches. We’re seeing the evolution of how we preserve and interact with technological history. The success of either approach will tell us something about what we value as a culture: whether we prioritize the sanctity of original components or the accessibility and sustainability of modern recreations. Perhaps the most beautiful aspect of this entire situation is that both options exist at all, giving enthusiasts the choice to define their own relationship with gaming history. In the end, whether you choose resurrection or recreation, the magic happens when those plastic bricks suddenly come alive with the sounds and sights of childhood memories.
About the Author
