There’s something hauntingly familiar about watching ordinary people fight for survival in twisted versions of childhood games. Both Squid Game and Alice in Borderland tap into this primal fear, but they approach it from fundamentally different angles that reveal more about our collective psyche than about which show is objectively better. We’re living in an era where the line between entertainment and existential dread has blurred, and these series have become cultural touchstones precisely because they mirror our anxieties about modern life—the crushing weight of debt, the feeling of being trapped in systems beyond our control, and the desperate search for meaning in a world that often feels like it’s playing games with our lives.
What fascinates me most about the Squid Game phenomenon isn’t just the brutal games themselves, but how they strip away the veneer of civilization to reveal the raw humanity underneath. The show’s genius lies in its simplicity—these aren’t complex puzzles requiring specialized knowledge, but childhood games everyone understands. This accessibility makes the horror more immediate, more personal. When characters play Red Light, Green Light or tug-of-war, we’re not just watching fictional characters; we’re confronting the terrifying possibility that any of us could be in their shoes, forced to make impossible choices for survival. The games become metaphors for the economic systems that trap us, the social contracts that bind us, and the desperate measures people take when they have nothing left to lose.
Meanwhile, Alice in Borderland operates on a different frequency altogether. Where Squid Game grounds itself in gritty realism, Borderland embraces the surreal and psychological. The parallel Tokyo setting feels like a fever dream version of our world, where logic is suspended and survival depends on solving elaborate puzzles. This isn’t just about physical survival—it’s about mental fortitude, strategic thinking, and the psychological toll of being trapped in a world that makes no sense. The characters aren’t just fighting to stay alive; they’re fighting to maintain their sanity in a reality that constantly shifts beneath their feet. There’s a cerebral quality to Borderland that appeals to our fascination with mind games and psychological manipulation.
The real tension between these two shows lies in their philosophical underpinnings. Squid Game asks what happens when economic desperation meets childhood innocence, creating a chilling commentary on capitalism’s dehumanizing effects. The characters are deeply relatable because their motivations are painfully familiar—they’re not seeking adventure or glory, but escape from financial ruin. Alice in Borderland, by contrast, explores existential themes of purpose and meaning. The characters aren’t just surviving; they’re questioning why they’re surviving, what gives life value, and whether any of it matters in a world that feels like an elaborate simulation. Both shows hold up mirrors to our society, but they reflect different facets of our collective anxiety.
As we continue to consume these survival narratives, it’s worth asking why they resonate so deeply with modern audiences. Perhaps it’s because we all feel like we’re playing games with higher stakes than we understand, navigating systems whose rules we didn’t write. Or maybe it’s the catharsis of watching characters face literal versions of the metaphorical battles we fight every day. Both Squid Game and Alice in Borderland, in their distinct ways, give form to our formless fears, turning abstract anxieties into tangible challenges that can be overcome—or at least understood. They remind us that the most dangerous games aren’t the ones with lasers and timers, but the ones we play with our own humanity every single day.
About the Author
