There’s something wonderfully absurd about watching a grown adult carefully assemble a plastic brick replica of a Game Boy, only to immediately tear it apart and rebuild it into something that actually works. This is exactly what’s happening in modding circles right now, where the recently released Lego Game Boy set has become less of a display piece and more of a challenge waiting to be conquered. The most fascinating part isn’t that people are doing this—it’s that they’re approaching the problem from completely different philosophical angles, creating a miniature culture war between purists and pragmatists in the process.
On one side, we have Natalie the Nerd, who represents the traditionalist approach in the most untraditional way possible. Her method involves cramming actual Game Boy hardware—the original chips, the authentic cartridge slot, the whole vintage package—into the Lego shell. There’s something deeply satisfying about this approach that goes beyond mere functionality. It’s like preserving the soul of the original device while giving it a playful new body. The fact that she’s using original Nintendo components rather than emulation speaks to a particular kind of reverence for gaming history, a desire to maintain that tangible connection to the past even while reinventing its form.
Meanwhile, the Swiss modders at Substance Labs have taken what might be called the modernist route with their BrickBoy project. By opting for emulation rather than original hardware, they’ve prioritized accessibility and ease of installation over authenticity. Their approach feels more like a clever hack than a meticulous restoration, and there’s genuine value in that perspective too. The magnetic sensors for buttons and the streamlined installation process suggest they’re thinking about the everyday Lego enthusiast who might not have advanced soldering skills but still wants to experience the magic of a working brick-based handheld.
What strikes me most about both approaches is how they reflect different attitudes toward preservation and innovation in retro gaming. Natalie’s method is essentially archeology—digging up the original artifacts and finding new ways to display them. The Substance Labs approach is more like translation—taking the original experience and rendering it in a new language. Both are valid, both are impressive, and both serve different audiences within the same community. It’s a reminder that in the world of modification, there’s rarely one right way to solve a problem.
As these kits eventually become available to the public, we’re witnessing something special: the democratization of hardware hacking. What was once the domain of expert engineers with specialized tools is becoming accessible to anyone with a Lego set and some patience. This represents a significant shift in how we interact with technology—from passive consumers to active creators who aren’t satisfied with products as they’re sold to us. The fact that multiple solutions are emerging simultaneously suggests we’re at the beginning of a new era where modification isn’t just accepted but expected, and where the line between toy and tool continues to blur in the most delightful ways.
About the Author
