There’s a peculiar phenomenon happening in the streaming landscape where two shows can emerge from different cultural contexts, share similar DNA, and yet follow dramatically different trajectories. Alice in Borderland and Squid Game represent this paradox perfectly—two series that explore the deadly game genre but have become increasingly difficult to distinguish as they’ve evolved. What began as two distinct approaches to survival fiction has gradually morphed into something that feels less like creative competition and more like creative convergence, and not necessarily for the better.
The fundamental tension between these shows lies in their philosophical approach to the games themselves. Alice in Borderland presents elaborate, puzzle-based challenges that reward intelligence and strategic thinking. There’s a mathematical elegance to its deadly contests, where clever players can find backdoor solutions and loopholes that allow for collective survival. Squid Game, by contrast, strips everything down to childhood games made lethal, emphasizing the brutal simplicity of chance and human nature over complex problem-solving. One celebrates intellectual triumph while the other exposes the raw vulnerability of desperation.
Where Alice in Borderland truly stumbles in its later seasons is in its apparent identity crisis. The show that once confidently carved its own path through intricate game design and psychological depth now seems to be chasing the shadow of Squid Game’s global success. This creative drift manifests in ways that feel less like homage and more like imitation, diluting what made the series special in the first place. The unique flavor of Borderland’s mysterious parallel Tokyo gets overshadowed by narrative choices that echo its Korean counterpart too closely, creating a sense of déjà vu rather than fresh excitement.
The character development divide between these series reveals another critical distinction. Squid Game builds its emotional foundation through gradual character revelation, letting us understand the motivations and backgrounds of its players organically over time. Alice in Borderland often opts for a more accelerated approach, sometimes sacrificing depth for plot momentum. This creates an interesting dynamic where one show feels like a character study set against deadly games, while the other feels like a game show with characters—both valid approaches, but with different emotional impacts.
What’s particularly fascinating about this comparison is how it reflects broader trends in global streaming content. As platforms like Netflix seek to replicate successful formulas, we’re seeing genre boundaries blur in ways that can diminish creative risk-taking. The pressure to appeal to international audiences sometimes leads to homogenization, where unique cultural perspectives get smoothed over into more universally palatable but less distinctive narratives. Both shows started with strong individual identities, but the gravitational pull of commercial success seems to be reshaping one to resemble the other.
Ultimately, the conversation around Alice in Borderland and Squid Game speaks to a larger question about artistic integrity in the age of streaming dominance. When a show finds its voice and builds a dedicated following, should it stay true to that vision even if it means remaining a cult favorite? Or does the pressure to capture mainstream attention inevitably lead to creative compromises? The evolution of these two series offers a case study in how global success can both validate and potentially undermine what made a story special in the first place. Perhaps the real game isn’t happening on screen, but in the boardrooms where decisions about artistic direction are made.
About the Author
